我脸挫伤现有一点红肿加青紫，有什么好的...
我脸挫伤现有一点红肿加青紫，有什么好的....
我脸挫伤现有一点红肿加青紫，有什么好的处理方法吗？
医院出诊医生
擅长：皮肤病
擅长：小儿内科
共1条医生回复
因不能面诊，医生的建议及药品推荐仅供参考
职称：医生会员
专长：骨科 普外科
&&已帮助用户：40295
这种情况建议最好是外用活血化瘀药物治疗需要效果比较好。
问脸被打伤了，眼睛红肿，嘴唇青紫
职称：医师
专长：视网膜脱落,飞蚊症,视网膜炎,视神经炎,玻璃体后脱离,玻璃体出血,玻璃体积血,老年性黄斑变性,缺血性视神经病变,脉络膜黑色素瘤
&&已帮助用户：18217
问题分析：你好，这种情况主要是外伤导致的皮下淤血及水肿引起的症状。意见建议：建议先进性冷敷，减缓淤血及水肿的进展。48小时后改为热敷，可以促进淤血及水肿吸收，同时可以服用几外用跌打损伤的药物，严重需要及时就医。
问脚背扭伤，青紫红肿该怎么处理？
职称：医生会员
专长：高血压
&&已帮助用户：46654
病情分析： 你好,针灸,按摩有一定疗效,外用红花油,云南白药喷雾剂,扶他林软膏等活血化瘀止痛的药物.疼痛可以服用扶他林等消炎止痛药物和中药如三七片等.适当休息.
问昨天被晒伤，求处理方法
职称：医生会员
专长：蜂窝组织炎,消化道出血,胃十二指肠溃疡瘢痕性幽门梗阻
&&已帮助用户：209912
指导意见：你好，可能是属于晒伤的症状，一般情况下建议及时看医生检查，芦荟胶试试，冷敷试试。
问幼儿在洋灰地挫伤了怎么办
挫伤的是脸 眼睛周围
职称：医师
专长：小儿内科
&&已帮助用户：373104
指导意见：这个情况要注意做好消毒为好，外用芦荟胶抹抹，同时要注意平时的护理为好的，有利于身体健康。
问脸红肿疼痛，跟火烧一样
职称：医生会员
专长：内科、上呼吸道感染
&&已帮助用户：45801
问题分析：您好，根据您对病情的描述，考虑您存在皮炎，可以用氟轻松乳膏即可意见建议：还要注意饮食，不要吃辛辣刺激的食物，要多喝水，身体缺水皮肤就会很干燥，多吃蔬菜，水果，
问那可以用牛奶加汤圆粉敷吗？我很着急，整个脸都红肿
职称：医生会员
专长：各种皮肤疾病、性病、肛肠科
&&已帮助用户：10166
病情分析： 你好朋友。你可能是接触性皮炎是指由于接触某种物质后，在皮肤或黏膜接触部位发生的一种炎症性反应，可分原发刺激性接触性皮炎和变态反应性接触性皮炎两种类型，接触性皮炎的物质很多，主要有化学性、动物性、植物性。意见建议：脱离过敏源，口服录雷他定，外用炉甘石或皮质类醇激素药膏。忌辛、辣、刺激性食物。祝你康复
关注此问题的人还看了
大家都在搜：
关注健康生活！
我得痤疮一年多了,找皮肤科医生看好了,却留下了痘印一年都没有消
痤疮的发生与青春期性激素大量增加有关，雄激素水平增高引起皮脂腺
其实皮肤过敏疾病的症状表现都是相当的突出的，并且在季节更替的情
湿疹是由多种复杂的内、外因素引起的一种具有多型性皮损和易有渗出
鱼鳞病又称“蛇皮癣”,是一种遗传性疾病,临床80%左右的患者均
荨麻疹患者要注意自己的饮食，含有刺激的食物、发物、过敏性食物等
湿疹这种疾病，一般男性发生的几率要比女性要大，因为很多男性不注
成年人青春痘也叫成年人暗疮，与情绪、压力、睡眠不足、饮食刺激…
你好，会形成慢性荨麻疹，拖延病程。荨麻疹，俗称“风团”，是一种
过敏性皮炎是由过敏原引起的皮肤病，主要是指人体接触到某些过敏源
百度联盟推广
免费向百万名医生提问
填写症状 描述信息，如：小孩头不发烧，手脚冰凉，是怎么回事？
无需注册，10分钟内回答
搜狗联盟推广
百度联盟推广
医生在线咨询
评价成功！本站已经通过实名认证，所有内容由张文显大夫本人发表
先天性左耳道闭锁伴耳廓畸形,左脸小,手术时间,左脸改善情况...
状态：就诊前
状态：就诊前
补充:
病情:出生发现(附照片)
曾经治疗:未
求帮助:左耳什么时候手术好?左脸会越来越小吗?现阶段该怎么做?(跪求)
状态：就诊前
外耳再造手术一般都在孩子5岁前后做。其他方面有问题的话，你先带孩子去你们当地较大的正规医院就诊检查。
状态：就诊前
脸小是由耳朵闭锁引起的吗?
有这方面的因素吗?
不是“耳闭锁”引起的。
状态：就诊前
一个脸大一个脸小很明显的话,可以做整形手术纠正吗?能做的话要多大才能做?
成年后，至少青春期以后做。
状态：就诊前
谢谢张主任!
bb现在还小,我能做些什么促进他的左脸发育吗?
目前不用做什么，1岁后每年做个颌面骨的检查看看骨骼发育的情况再说。
状态：就诊前
张文显大夫通知通知:亲爱的患者朋友
你好：感谢你一直以来的支持与信任，2016即将结束，我希望有一天医生是最不容易被想起来的人，这说明大家都很健康，不需要我。2017新的一年祝愿你们平安健康幸福，我将继续为你的健康保驾护航。感谢我的患者朋友对我的信任。
大夫郑重提醒：因不能面诊患者，无法全面了解病情，以上建议仅供参考，具体诊疗请一定到医院在医生指导下进行！
疾病名称：外耳道闭锁&&
希望得到的帮助：想做手术，需要去门诊就诊吗，
病情描述：先天性外耳道闭锁，想知道多大年龄做合适手术，听力有，做完有后遗症吗，手术后会有不良反应吗？
疾病名称：左侧外耳道先天性闭锁，耳廓畸形&&
病情描述（发病时间、主要症状、就诊医院等）：
小孩今年6岁，左侧外耳道闭锁，耳廓畸形，1岁时在中南大学湘雅2医院检查听力，今年5月在郴州cT示左侧乳突气化型，未见骨性外耳道形成。中耳，内...
投诉类型：
投诉说明：（200个汉字以内）
张文显大夫的信息
小儿各种畸形矫治，各种瘢痕的综合治疗，面颈部及乳房综合整形美容；脂肪抽吸减肥体形雕塑；生殖器官整形
张文显，男，主任医师，河北省儿童医院整形美容外科主任，现任中华医学会整形外科分会小儿整形外科专业委员...
张文显大夫的电话咨询
90%当天通话，沟通充分!
小儿整形科可通话专家
副主任医师
复旦大学附属儿科医院
小儿整形科
天津儿童医院
南京市儿童医院
烧伤整形外科
副主任医师
南京市儿童医院
烧伤整形外科
重庆儿童医院
整形烧伤外科
副主任医师
北京儿童医院
山西省儿童医院(山西省妇幼保健院)(袁湘琴子)
(吃口菠萝打个嗝)
(随觉随炮)
(王鹤棣的小宝贝)
第三方登录：4被浏览2,828分享邀请回答hoax-slayer.com/issue58.html
下文为节选，直接对这个team做的分析：
I first began receiving submissions about this factually dubious "health warning" message (see example below)in late 2005. The warning, which travels via email, blogs and online forum posts, claims that mobile phone users should only use the left ear for making calls, supposedly to lessen the effects of exposure to cell phone radiation. The message attempts to convince readers that using the right ear for mobile calls can directly damage the brain and it is therefore wiser to favour the left ear. Like other such warnings, the message does not include any external references to support its claims.
Not surprisingly, I have found no evidence to confirm the claims outlined in the message. The message includes a diagrammatical image apparently intended to add a degree of credibility to the information. Ironically however, the diagram has no direct relevance to the spurious claim that using the left ear is preferable to using the right. Although the subject matter of this infographic does relate to possible dangers from mobile phone radiation, a closer examination reveals that it makes no reference at all to using the left ear in preference to the right.
A small amount of web research based on the source information included on the graphic revealed that it was first published in June 2002 by the Graphics News website. The diagram simply summarizes in graphical form the findings of a study (see reference list for for pdf link) by scientists at Finland's Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority. A 2002 BBC news report offers more information about this study. The report notes that:Scientists from the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority found that exposing human cells to mobile phone radiation damaged the blood-brain barrier - a safety barrier in the body that stops harmful substances in blood from entering the brain.However, the report makes clear that the tests were carried out on human cells under precise laboratory conditions and at the time the report was published it was not known if the findings actually equated to genuine health concerns for phone users. Moreover, neither the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority study nor the BBC report mention anything about which ear, if any, is the safest to use.
Almost since the invention of the devices, there has been a long running debate about the possible health effects of mobile phone use. A number of reports have raised authentic concerns about possible health risks from mobile phone radiation. However, no credible information that I have seen mentions any correlation between increased health risks and the habitual use of the right ear for mobile calls.
The message claims that the information is "a true fact from Apollo medical team" (as opposed, apparently, to a "false fact" ). However, I could find no information about an "Apollo medical team" other than references to the hoax message itself. If the information in the message had any validity, then the group that conducted the research would undoubtedly have published its findings via credible media such as scientific journals and medical websites. Thus, if the "Apollo medical team" was a real entity that actually did conduct a study about mobile phone radiation, then research should reveal at least some information about the team and its work. I suspect that the "Apollo medical team" reference was added to falsely imply some measure of endorsement from the Apollo Hospitals Group in India.
This message possibly originated as some foolish individual's idea of a prank. Or, as with many other hoaxes, it may have been a deliberate attempt to spread misinformation and unnecessarily raise fear and alarm. Whatever the reason, it seems obvious that the perpetrator has used a blatant falsehood as the core claim in the message and then made a rather lame attempt to back it up by tacking on unrelated information stolen from another source.
Thus, forwarding this misleading "warning" message will serve no useful purpose. While there are real concerns about possible health risks related to mobile phone use, there is no evidence to suggest that using the left ear will in any way decrease such risks.
附：建议双手交换接打电话，因为电话打久了一只手会酸。3添加评论分享收藏感谢收起0添加评论分享收藏感谢收起写回答